Ethical Organization The Perfect Cover For Judges And Prosecutors Unethical Behavior?

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(Free-Press-Release.com) April 30, 2010 -- The District Court for District of Columbia and the United States District Attorney Agency needs to be overhauled. Many people constitutional rights are being violated and if you are not legally savvy or can articulate the law for oneself you will be doomed. Even when you know the law but you represent yourself as pro se, your filing is handled in a kangaroo style by the court. Most lawyers in DC are in a society club or have aspiration to being admitted to “the society” club. These clubs are under the pretense of ethics which is laughable.

The Edward Bennett Williams American Inn of Court is an invitation-only professional organization that has distinction of being one of only a few Inns of Court specializing in white collar criminal prosecution and defense. Its membership includes D.C. Circuit Court Judges, District Court Judges, Superior Court Judges, DOJ Officials and some of the most established defense attorneys in town.
Many defense lawyers that practice in Washington DC will play along with the power that be, and will throw a case if it is within the interest of the power that be. For example in case of United States v. Kharii Brodie, the defense lawyers for Brodie threw his case.

In Brodie’s case, the Appeal Chief Judge David Sentelle is the President of the Edward Bennett Williams Inn of the American Inns of Court. Jonathan Rosen is a member and so is Judge Ellen Huvelle a member. The organization is alleged that it is designed to improve the skills, professionalism and ethics of the bench and bar.
Upon Brodie’s release from incarceration, Brodie studied the law and found that the government did not have subject matter jurisdiction; therefore the case is void. He is now waiting on the District Court official ruling to correct the court records. He is also suing for damages. The suit involved ten federal Judges and two prosecutors. Plus, two defense lawyers, former attorney general and the director of prison are being sued for the deprivation of Kharii W. Brodie constitutional rights.

Brodie alleged that the prosecutors conspired with Brodie’s lawyer and Ellen Huvelle to throw his case. Then on appeal the conspiracy was further carried out to incorporate Judge Karen Lecraft Henderson, Judge Merrick B. Garland, Judge Janice Rogers Brown, Judge David B. Sentelle, Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg, Judge Arthur Raymond Randolph, Judge Thomas B. Griffith and Judge Brett M. Kavaugh. Brodie submitted in appeal motion to dismiss based on defective indictment which basically referred to subject matter jurisdiction but was ignored by the judges and prosecutors. Although submitted four times, it was not addressed once. Furthermore, the indictment he was convicted on was never signed by the grand jury. Plus, even if the indictment could be giving any merit by the stretch of the imagination the charges was beyond the statute of limitations.
Brodie was indicted on conspiracy to commit wire fraud. The court seem to be now dragging their feet in ruling on the void judgment dismissal. Brodie was giving a fifty seven month sentence. The court caused his conviction to be printed in the law books and on the internet.

Brodie was also denied privileges that he would normally received based on inmates of similar status because BOP treated him as an illegal alien when he was a born United States citizen. They increased his custody level baselessly and held him in a prison that was under contract with BOP to house illegal aliens without due process of an immigration court.
Brodie’s civil case is pending waiting Judge Henry Kennedy’s ruling. Brodie filed for default judgment and was given default judgment but later the clerk of court stated it was entered in error. The defendants are being sued for $25,000,000.00 plus punitive damages.

defense lawyers     Judgment     lawsuit