How to screw up a BYOD rollout

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(Free-Press-Release.com) January 16, 2012 --

Companies with naive or shortsighted goals find that dumping mobile devices onto employees doesn't play out as planned The good news is that more and more companies are letting employees bring in their own smart phones and tablets, acknowledging the BYOD phenomenon. The bad news is that many are doing it badly and often regretting the results. It doesn't have to be that way, but an unhappy outcome seems to be the norm, especially at midsize companies, says Brandon Hampton, a director at Mobil Wireless Management, which provides a management service for mobile devices and carrier plans.
What shocked me was why so many customers are unhappy with the results.
The naive motivation for BYOD

The typical experience, Hampton says, is that companies that decide to migrate a large portion of their users from corporate-provisioned smartphones to employee-owned units -- in telco parlance, from corporate-liable to individual-liable -- are unhappy that it takes 20 to 30 minutes per user to accomplish the transition, including device setup, message forwarding, and so on. Also, they normally can't reduce their telecom support staff when the transition is done even though they've doubled or tripled the number of users in the process.
My reaction: How can they not be happy that two to three times as many employees are now able to be productive when on the go, while maintaing the same support overhead? (Hampton reported that support calls drop from an average of 4.5 per user per year to 2.5 when employees use their own devices, and the nature of support changes from dealing with billing questions to dealing with corporate access questions.) I also thought, "How could they expect the transition to require no effort? Plus, don't they get it's a one-time investment in increased productivity?"

Hampton laughed at my naïveté. The reason most companies -- especially midsize ones -- do a BYOD transition is not to increase productivity but to palm off telecom costs onto employees. Their goal is to reduce absolute cost; productivity and employee satisfaction are mere side effects. That of course is the problem: Their goals are naive, so what should be viewed as a positive outcome isn't. The problem is not that BYOD itself is negative, it's that many companies do it for the wrong reason and don't get what they wanted.
Poor implementation worsens naive approach to BYOD

Some companies compound the (perceived) poor results by making other mistakes. One is to have employees expense their mobile bills, which costs about $25 per expense report to process (adding cost). Hampton suggests that companies pay a flat fee, perhaps in each paycheck, for mobile reimbursement for users whose mobile needs are moderate, and buy and manage the devices (and data plans) used by heavy users. In his experience, the flat-fee reimbursement is cheaper, especially if you base it on role and have just a few tiers of reimbursement amounts. If you tie it into your Active Directory monitoring, you can see which employees are accessing corporate resources via mobile and reimburse just those employees.
He recommends companies continue to provision devices to heavy users even if you let them choose which device to use, as is increasingly common. That way, you can usually get better coverage plans, especially for international travelers, when you bundle them as a package to a provider.

The other common mistake is not to have a mobile management strategy in place; whether a device belongs to the company or employee and whether or not the company pays for it, you manage access to your network and corporate resources using mobile device management (MDM) and other tools based on policies you should already have in place for internal access to corporate resources. It turns out that many companies don't do this, then get surprised when a departed employees' tablet ends up on eBay still containing corporate data.
Hampton notes that midsize companies struggle with these issues more than large ones because they typically have a "phone guy" rather than a team of people experienced with the various areas, which include device management, security, policies, and carrier relations.
The "dump the costs" strategy may gain traction, unfortunately

Because the motivation at so many companies is to save money, but not increase employee productivity, Hampton has seen odd deployments. For example, one company charges its employees an annual fee for access to corporate resources from their personal devices. More surprising, employees are willing to pay this "convenience fee" to do work from their own devices.
Hampton has also seen companies purposely require the use of expense reports to claim stipends, knowing that many employees won't do the paperwork and the companies won't have to pay those stipends. Employee acceptance of such abusive actions only encourages the notion that BYOD means "shove the costs onto employees" rather than "let's figure out how to work better and smarter."

It's possible that "shove the costs onto employees" approach will only gain more acceptance. I've heard in the last year several executives muse about having employees buy their own computers, selling it as an opportunity to use a computer of their own choosing. They saw that employees were willing to buy iPhones, iPads, and Androids -- and that corporate security was not compromised in the process. Hampton has also heard such musings.
We've already seen companies stop paying for at-home phone lines and broadband, as employees willingly picked up the costs for their own convenience. Perhaps if this trend continues, we'll have to pay to use a desk at the office, like independent contractors such as hair stylists and real estate agents do.

I hope not. If a company's motivation is to shift costs to employees, BYOD and the con summarization-of-IT trend will fail to benefit that company in the medium to long term. The company will instead get employees used to standing apart from the organization, with the dire results that usually brings. You've been warned!

For more information: http://www.electrocomputerwarehouse.com

cheap computers     Refurbished C