I from 1997 has been on this issue, Office

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(Free-Press-Release.com) June 30, 2011 --  and in 2002 I work also wrote two articles, they are the OMG BPMN 1.0 standard references. I will repeat my some of these articles in view, may be more clearly, use different example. Here, my aim is to study the structure of the foundation as BPMS some misunderstanding, and presents a new blueprint for architecture, on this basis can be constructed a new business process management system. Microsoft Office is so great!
Falsehood 1: business analysis from the perspective of system modeling their process.

If you talk to practitioners, words they will tell you their from the user's perspective modeling process, not from the perspective of execution or the system perspective. This means that their process guide users to do what, they never modeling system for the response of the user input. So do have good reason: business continuity. If the system failed, users need to know what to do to make the business to continue. This is also the business analysts think, and how they define and obtain the index method process. This user perspective for business is very important, because it directly related to create value for workflow activities. Business analysts never according to the Office 2010 –save your time and save your money.
boundaries of the system, execution, news or business object thinking (developer is). Business analysts understand the system is at most a equivalent to the paper format is the electronic version of the screen (reading or input information).
Falsehood 2: business users can easily learn BPMN and use all the features.