INDIA: 13-year-old tribal girl raped by the headmaster of her school in Orissa

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(Free-Press-Release.com) November 9, 2011 -- Urgent Appeal Case: AHRC-UAC-229-2011

9 November 2011
------------------------------------------------------
Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has received information from the reliable human rights groups concerning the case of rape, by the headmaster of a tribal school of one of his students, a tribal girl, studying class four. The incident happened at Sunabeda KBK Sevashram School on the night of 15 October 2011. Namita (the name has been changed), the victim girl is from Renga Gram Panchayat of the Similiguda Block in Koraput district. It is reported that though the local police have registered a case, the accused is not yet been arrested, despite the horrific nature of the incident, and that he continuously threatens the victim girl as well as the villagers supporting her, so that they withdraw the complaint. It is also testified that the accused headmaster is a repeat offender, with a past of sexual abuse of children in his custody.

CASE NARRATIVE (based on the testimony from the victim and her parents):

The victim in the case, Namita, is thirteen years old from a tribal community Paroja. Namita is from Renga Gram Panchayat of the Similiguda Block in Koraput district. Namita is a student at the Sevashram School (KBK), Sunabeda, in Koraput district, where the accused, Mr Tarakanta Pani, aged 53, is the headmaster.

On 15 October at night, when Namita returned to school after holidays, the headmaster came to the dormitory she stays and asked her to clean his office room and serve him some water. Namita tried to avoid obliging as it was too late, but the headmaster forced her to come to his office room. When Namita was at the headmaster's room, he closed the door and raped Namita inside the room. Namita resisted but failed to stop the headmaster who was too strong for the feeble girl of 13 years to ward off. After the brutal incident, the headmaster said that, “you tribals, what you can do? I can call the goons and pay them money up to INR 20,000 and can do what I want.” He threatened Namita that should she inform anyone of what had happened to her she would have to face the consequences.

On 17 October, Namita left the school and returned home. When her parents asked her why she came back after just two days at school, she informed her parents that she was not feeling well. After three to four days her parents wanted her to return to school. At that point Namita narrated the incident to her mother. After listing to the incident the parents discussed the matter with some of the villagers and they decided to complain to the District Collector.

On 28 October, the parents went to meet the District Collector, District Welfare Officer (the officer in the district in charge of residential schools for the tribal) and an officer at the Integrated Tribal Development Agency (ITDA). They filed a written complaint to all the officers and further to sub-Collector narrating the incident. The headmaster called Namita’s father who was talking with the officials. The below is a dialogue between them according to Namita’s father.

Namita’s father asked, ″Why did u do so with my daughter? ″
Headmaster, ″It is a small incident, and don’t make it a big fuss. ″
Father, ″”Do you think you can play with all the girls life and escape? ″
Headmaster (with threatening voice), ″Why did you go to the DM? You should have come to me. ″
Father, ″I want you to be punished. ″
Headmaster, ″I can give you some money and we can close the case. ″
Father, ″I do not agree to your proposal. ″

The headmaster threatened Namita’s father over the phone not to pursue the issue any further.

With the support of grass-root human rights organisation, the parents went to Potangi Police Station that has jurisdiction of Renga Gram Panchayat to lodge a complaint. But the police refused to record the complaint and to register a First Information report (FIR) [FIR number 94 of 2011 of Sunabeda Police Station, dated 1 November 2011] upon the incident, though it is mandatory to do so under the provisions of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The police officers instead sent the family to Sunabeda Police Station on 1 November to file a FIR. The Sunebeda police registered a FIR upon the complaint on 1 November. The police did a formal investigation on 2 November. The police brought Namita to the school. The other girls who were present during the day of the incident did not speak anything before the police but did say that the headmaster was a dreaded character, and was a nasty person. Then the police took Namita for a medical examination and later the clothes of the headmaster along with that of Namita were sent to Berhampur for medical examination. The report of the medical examination is awaited.

In the meanwhile, the medical report after examining Namita has confirmed that she was raped. However, till today the headmaster has not been arrested. Making using of his extended liberty, the accused tries his best to suppress the case. It is alleged that he has already bribed some of the government officers in the district and also some local politicians. Now those who have accepted bribes from the headmaster threaten the victim's family along with the headmaster and asking them to "compromise" the case.

Independent investigation undertaken by the human rights defenders reveals a further shocking picture about the headmaster. He has reportedly raped another girl under his custody when he was stationed at Hikimput School in Nadapore Block. The accused is also suspected to be behind several similar incidents where the parents or the victims were threatened to remain silent or have refused to lodge a complaint since they were not sure whether the complaint would lead to any impartial investigation, and for fear of loss of honour of the girls and their families. It is also reported that the headmaster had sexually harassed one girl from Maliput village studying at Hikimput School, and the victim attempted to commit suicide by consuming poison but was saved owing to the intervention of her parents. It is reported that the headmaster gave about INR 20,000 (USD 404) to suppress that incident in October. Since then the victim girl does not go to school any more.

Another girl from the Namita's school (identity not revealed for fear of threats) and a relative of Namita studying/staying in the school hostel in class nine testified that, "the headmaster is very nasty, he always watches when the girls take bath. He wears a short towel and stands when the girls take bath. He has harassed several tribal girls in hostel." … "When the victim's parents approached the police station the teacher warned her not to speak anything against him”. The same girl however remained silent due to fear when the police investigated the incident. Some teachers of the same school are of the opinion that the headmaster is a womanizer.

Understandably, Namita today is scared of attending school and is in such a trauma that she is not able to speak properly and keeps crying. Namita's father is a marginal farmer and holds a Below Poverty Line (BPL) card. He has four children, one son and three daughters. Namita is the eldest.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
http://www.humanrights.asia/news/urgent-appeals/AHRC-UAC-229-2011

child abuse     corruption     Impunity     indigenous community     Police inaction     violence against women