July 12, 2004 (Press Release) --
There is some information that the American Public should be made aware of when it comes time to cast their vote for the Candidates.
It is a KNOWN FACT, according to Burke's Peerage, that the Presidential Candidate with the most Royal Blood ALWAYS WINS THE ELECTION. In an article dated October 25, 2000 and which, apparently, originated with ABC News from London (URL below) via reporter Tony Eufinger, they had this to say about our elections, "'The presidential candidate with the most royal genes and chromosomes has, up to now, ALWAYS won the White House,' say the researchers at Burke's Peerage." This same article goes on to state that Buckingham Palace had nothing to say concerning this puzzle.
Now, this is an extremely revealing statement, to say the least. We're not talking about half of the time (as one would expect) or even the majority of the time (as one might possibly believe) but EVERY TIME. An explanation for this FACT must be presented to the American Republic, and, really, to the World at large.
The Experts in the field - Burke's Peerage - equate this phenomenon to the candidates "genes and chromosomes" in the quote above which defies logic and Mathmatical Probability and is about as unscientific and unreal and unlikely as their jeans and kodachromes being the deciding factor.
Perhaps Jack Edward (URL below) provides us with a little more insight into this subject when he says of his call to Burke's Peerage that, "This time, we were able to get Mr. Harold Brooks-Baker on the phone. He asked why we wanted the information, and said he would have to clear our request with Washington. He said, 'It's a very touchy subject.' He talked like there might be something to hide."
Indeed...
There is only ONE EXPLANATION for this FACT and that is what is known as The Peerage, and, it is based on the more Noble person being given the prominence in any particular situation; be it who sits closest to the Prince at the Dinner Table, or who is given the stewardship of any particular governance position in the Kingdom.
In other words, to spell it out for ya; the Throne in England has been putting the more 'noble' candidate in office in America for about 200 years, in order to cover their assets in their colony here in America (and whatever other nation on the globe that they consider to be part of their "Sun-Never-Sets-On-The" Neo British Empire).
This indicates that the British Monarchy (and assuredly the other ones in Europe) have considerably more power and influence in Global affairs then we have been led to believe and should cause every nation and their citizens to re-evaluate what the situation really is in their own respective countries. Are they, in reality, slaves to the Crown through their respective Feudal Lords?
The Truth shall set you free...
-------------------------------------------------
Jack Edwards
http://www.asis.com/~stag/uspres.html
ABC News
http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/Web%20Pages/ABC%20NEWS_Royal%20Red%20Carpet%20is%20Path%20to%20White%
20House.htm
It is a KNOWN FACT, according to Burke's Peerage, that the Presidential Candidate with the most Royal Blood ALWAYS WINS THE ELECTION. In an article dated October 25, 2000 and which, apparently, originated with ABC News from London (URL below) via reporter Tony Eufinger, they had this to say about our elections, "'The presidential candidate with the most royal genes and chromosomes has, up to now, ALWAYS won the White House,' say the researchers at Burke's Peerage." This same article goes on to state that Buckingham Palace had nothing to say concerning this puzzle.
Now, this is an extremely revealing statement, to say the least. We're not talking about half of the time (as one would expect) or even the majority of the time (as one might possibly believe) but EVERY TIME. An explanation for this FACT must be presented to the American Republic, and, really, to the World at large.
The Experts in the field - Burke's Peerage - equate this phenomenon to the candidates "genes and chromosomes" in the quote above which defies logic and Mathmatical Probability and is about as unscientific and unreal and unlikely as their jeans and kodachromes being the deciding factor.
Perhaps Jack Edward (URL below) provides us with a little more insight into this subject when he says of his call to Burke's Peerage that, "This time, we were able to get Mr. Harold Brooks-Baker on the phone. He asked why we wanted the information, and said he would have to clear our request with Washington. He said, 'It's a very touchy subject.' He talked like there might be something to hide."
Indeed...
There is only ONE EXPLANATION for this FACT and that is what is known as The Peerage, and, it is based on the more Noble person being given the prominence in any particular situation; be it who sits closest to the Prince at the Dinner Table, or who is given the stewardship of any particular governance position in the Kingdom.
In other words, to spell it out for ya; the Throne in England has been putting the more 'noble' candidate in office in America for about 200 years, in order to cover their assets in their colony here in America (and whatever other nation on the globe that they consider to be part of their "Sun-Never-Sets-On-The" Neo British Empire).
This indicates that the British Monarchy (and assuredly the other ones in Europe) have considerably more power and influence in Global affairs then we have been led to believe and should cause every nation and their citizens to re-evaluate what the situation really is in their own respective countries. Are they, in reality, slaves to the Crown through their respective Feudal Lords?
The Truth shall set you free...
-------------------------------------------------
Jack Edwards
http://www.asis.com/~stag/uspres.html
ABC News
http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/Web%20Pages/ABC%20NEWS_Royal%20Red%20Carpet%20is%20Path%20to%20White%
20House.htm

The Royal Factor in Presidential Elections and what it means...
Email
Print
SPAM




