May 25, 2006 (Press Release) --
Book Review of The Da Vinci Code
“The Grail,” Langdon said, “is symbolic of the lost goddess. When
Christianity came along, the old pagan religions did not die easily.
Legends of chivalric quests for the Holy Grail were in fact stories of
forbidden quests to find the lost sacred feminine. Knights who claimed to
be “searching for the chalice” were speaking in code as a way to protect
themselves from a Church that had subjugated women, banished the Goddess,
burned non-believers, and forbidden the pagan reverence for the sacred
feminine.” (The Da Vinci Code, pages 238-239)
The Holy Grail is a favorite metaphor for a desirable but difficult-to-
attain goal, from the map of the human genome to Lord Stanley’s Cup.
While the original Grail—the cup Jesus allegedly used at the Last Supper
—normally inhabits the pages of Arthurian romance, Dan Brown’s recent
mega–best-seller, The Da Vinci Code, rips it away to the realm of
esoteric history.
But his book is more than just the story of a quest for the Grail—he
wholly reinterprets the Grail legend. In doing so, Brown inverts the
insight that a woman’s body is symbolically a container and makes a
container symbolically a woman’s body. And that container has a name
every Christian will recognize, for Brown claims that the Holy Grail was
actually Mary Magdalene. She was the vessel that held the blood of Jesus
Christ in her womb while bearing his children.
Over the centuries, the Grail-keepers have been guarding the true (and
continuing) bloodline of Christ and the relics of the Magdalen, not a
material vessel. Therefore Brown claims that “the quest for the Holy
Grail is the quest to kneel before the bones of Mary Magdalene,” a
conclusion that would surely have surprised Sir Galahad and the other
Grail knights who thought they were searching for the Chalice of the Last
Supper.
The Da Vinci Code opens with the grisly murder of the Louvre’s curator
inside the museum. The crime enmeshes hero Robert Langdon, a tweedy
professor of symbolism from Harvard, and the victim’s granddaughter,
burgundy-haired cryptologist Sophie Nevue. Together with crippled
millionaire historian Leigh Teabing, they flee Paris for London one step
ahead of the police and a mad albino Opus Dei “monk” named Silas who
will stop at nothing to prevent them from finding the “Grail.”
But even Brown has his limits. To dodge charges of outright bigotry, he
includes a climactic twist in the story that absolves the Church of
assassination. And although he presents Christianity as a false root and
branch, he’s willing to tolerate it for its charitable works.
Source: http://search.msn.com
Posted By Sandra Miesel
“The Grail,” Langdon said, “is symbolic of the lost goddess. When
Christianity came along, the old pagan religions did not die easily.
Legends of chivalric quests for the Holy Grail were in fact stories of
forbidden quests to find the lost sacred feminine. Knights who claimed to
be “searching for the chalice” were speaking in code as a way to protect
themselves from a Church that had subjugated women, banished the Goddess,
burned non-believers, and forbidden the pagan reverence for the sacred
feminine.” (The Da Vinci Code, pages 238-239)
The Holy Grail is a favorite metaphor for a desirable but difficult-to-
attain goal, from the map of the human genome to Lord Stanley’s Cup.
While the original Grail—the cup Jesus allegedly used at the Last Supper
—normally inhabits the pages of Arthurian romance, Dan Brown’s recent
mega–best-seller, The Da Vinci Code, rips it away to the realm of
esoteric history.
But his book is more than just the story of a quest for the Grail—he
wholly reinterprets the Grail legend. In doing so, Brown inverts the
insight that a woman’s body is symbolically a container and makes a
container symbolically a woman’s body. And that container has a name
every Christian will recognize, for Brown claims that the Holy Grail was
actually Mary Magdalene. She was the vessel that held the blood of Jesus
Christ in her womb while bearing his children.
Over the centuries, the Grail-keepers have been guarding the true (and
continuing) bloodline of Christ and the relics of the Magdalen, not a
material vessel. Therefore Brown claims that “the quest for the Holy
Grail is the quest to kneel before the bones of Mary Magdalene,” a
conclusion that would surely have surprised Sir Galahad and the other
Grail knights who thought they were searching for the Chalice of the Last
Supper.
The Da Vinci Code opens with the grisly murder of the Louvre’s curator
inside the museum. The crime enmeshes hero Robert Langdon, a tweedy
professor of symbolism from Harvard, and the victim’s granddaughter,
burgundy-haired cryptologist Sophie Nevue. Together with crippled
millionaire historian Leigh Teabing, they flee Paris for London one step
ahead of the police and a mad albino Opus Dei “monk” named Silas who
will stop at nothing to prevent them from finding the “Grail.”
But even Brown has his limits. To dodge charges of outright bigotry, he
includes a climactic twist in the story that absolves the Church of
assassination. And although he presents Christianity as a false root and
branch, he’s willing to tolerate it for its charitable works.
Source: http://search.msn.com
Posted By Sandra Miesel

“The Grail,” Langdon said, “is symbolic of the lost goddess. When
Christianity came along, the old pagan religions did not die easily.
Email
Print
SPAM
LEAVE A COMMENT





