Problem eaters and dieters are too readily being pushed into medical categorisations, limiting abilities to self-help and recover.
August 15, 2006 (Press Release) --
A leading weight-control organisation believes that exaggerated claims about the extent of eating disorders are contributing to the general obesity crisis.
The Weight Foundation says that whilst major eating disorders remain dangerous and distressing, over-zealous diagnoses are fanning the flames of food distress.
And the charity claims that much more emphasis needs to be placed on researching dieting, which it argues is a significantly under-recognised epidemic.
Founder Malcolm Evans explains that predictions are now commonplace that 30-50% of women will experience an eating disorder some time within their lifetime.
“This is what is called 'pathologising' - the categorisation of problems or conditions into disease. Once issues become concretised like this, the focus of remedy changes. It goes from being voluntary habit change to becoming treatment by third parties,” he says.
“I do not for one minute believe that up to half of women will suffer an eating disorder. However what I believe matters not at all; if people expect themselves to be at risk, then risk automatically increases.”
Until recently, definitions of eating disorders have generally comprised Anorexia and Bulimia. The research community is now provisionally exploring 'Binge Eating Disorder' to capture the notion of repeated and out of control overeating. BED as a concept is ring-fenced with a considerable array of necessary anxieties and obsessions to differentiate it from lesser overeating.
Despite the cautious progress of researchers in testing the boundaries of eating disorders, Evans is convinced that a less-sophisticated eating disorders bandwagon is creating a disruptive and destructive momentum.
“Individual issues of self-image anxieties, overeating, continual dieting and obesity concerns are being conflated into broader quasi-medical conditions.
“This is not to downplay for one minute the dangers and distress caused by full-blown eating disorders, including serious binge eating. However people can exercise a far greater control over what is personal and cultural than they can over what is becoming to be seen as endemic and medical,” comments the 46 year old Manchester social entrepreneur.
The Weight Foundation is researching the causes and culture of long-term dieting. It believes that dieting, for many people, has become a way of life largely divorced from any useful connection with weight-loss and weight-control.
“The more the eating disorder zealots push too many people down the road of disease labelling, the lower the chances for lots of them of maintaining a natural and relaxed relationship with food,” says Evans.
The Weight Foundation says that whilst major eating disorders remain dangerous and distressing, over-zealous diagnoses are fanning the flames of food distress.
And the charity claims that much more emphasis needs to be placed on researching dieting, which it argues is a significantly under-recognised epidemic.
Founder Malcolm Evans explains that predictions are now commonplace that 30-50% of women will experience an eating disorder some time within their lifetime.
“This is what is called 'pathologising' - the categorisation of problems or conditions into disease. Once issues become concretised like this, the focus of remedy changes. It goes from being voluntary habit change to becoming treatment by third parties,” he says.
“I do not for one minute believe that up to half of women will suffer an eating disorder. However what I believe matters not at all; if people expect themselves to be at risk, then risk automatically increases.”
Until recently, definitions of eating disorders have generally comprised Anorexia and Bulimia. The research community is now provisionally exploring 'Binge Eating Disorder' to capture the notion of repeated and out of control overeating. BED as a concept is ring-fenced with a considerable array of necessary anxieties and obsessions to differentiate it from lesser overeating.
Despite the cautious progress of researchers in testing the boundaries of eating disorders, Evans is convinced that a less-sophisticated eating disorders bandwagon is creating a disruptive and destructive momentum.
“Individual issues of self-image anxieties, overeating, continual dieting and obesity concerns are being conflated into broader quasi-medical conditions.
“This is not to downplay for one minute the dangers and distress caused by full-blown eating disorders, including serious binge eating. However people can exercise a far greater control over what is personal and cultural than they can over what is becoming to be seen as endemic and medical,” comments the 46 year old Manchester social entrepreneur.
The Weight Foundation is researching the causes and culture of long-term dieting. It believes that dieting, for many people, has become a way of life largely divorced from any useful connection with weight-loss and weight-control.
“The more the eating disorder zealots push too many people down the road of disease labelling, the lower the chances for lots of them of maintaining a natural and relaxed relationship with food,” says Evans.
Email
Print
SPAM
