Explorer Robert Sarmast has released results from his high-tech investigation of his Cyprus Atlantis site. Subb-bottom profile of the central hill and "wall" showed only a pile of mud.
November 28, 2006 (Press Release) --
2006 Hi-Tech Expedition At "Cyprus Atlantis" Concluded: Alleged "Stone Walls and Manmade Structures" Are A Huge Mud Pile—But It's Still Atlantis (Or Maybe Eden)
In November 2004, Robert Sarmast claimed that he had absolute, indisputable proof that Atlantis was off coastal Cyprus in deep water. Sarmast, an architect, claimed that the Cyprus area almost "perfectly matches" what Plato stated about Atlantis, and in a 2004 press conference claimed that he had found manmade structures, a stone wall, and canals at the site by using side-scan sonar. A French geologist and German physicist stated they had surveyed the area in 2003 (with several other scientists) and found that what Sarmast claimed to be the central hill of Atlantis was actually a well-known 100,000-year old volcanic ridge with mud slides ringing some sides of the ancient volcanoes. Sarmast posted the results from his high-tech investigation of his Cyprus Atlantis site on October 27, 2006. "As far as the results go, we did not bring back the irrefutable proof that we were hoping for," Sarmast wrote. What he found was "The structures/walls are natural and not man-made." It is a massive pile of mud (a mud diapir) matching the 2003 scientific survey results by scientists. For more info: http://www.mysterious-america.net/cyprus-atlantis2.html
In November 2004, Robert Sarmast claimed that he had absolute, indisputable proof that Atlantis was off coastal Cyprus in deep water. Sarmast, an architect, claimed that the Cyprus area almost "perfectly matches" what Plato stated about Atlantis, and in a 2004 press conference claimed that he had found manmade structures, a stone wall, and canals at the site by using side-scan sonar. A French geologist and German physicist stated they had surveyed the area in 2003 (with several other scientists) and found that what Sarmast claimed to be the central hill of Atlantis was actually a well-known 100,000-year old volcanic ridge with mud slides ringing some sides of the ancient volcanoes. Sarmast posted the results from his high-tech investigation of his Cyprus Atlantis site on October 27, 2006. "As far as the results go, we did not bring back the irrefutable proof that we were hoping for," Sarmast wrote. What he found was "The structures/walls are natural and not man-made." It is a massive pile of mud (a mud diapir) matching the 2003 scientific survey results by scientists. For more info: http://www.mysterious-america.net/cyprus-atlantis2.html
Email
Print
SPAM
