You are here: Home
Blogging & Social Media
Other
Click Defense confirms New “Bang Box” Click Fraud Scheme
Click Defense confirms New “Bang Box” Click Fraud Scheme
Scott Boyenger, CEO of Click Defense (www.clickdefense.com), today announced that Click Defense has independently confirmed log files associated with the “Bang Box” click fraud criminal complaint case
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(Free-Press-Release.com) May 10, 2007 --
May 9, 2007 -- Scott Boyenger, CEO of Click Defense (www.clickdefense.com), today announced that Click Defense has independently confirmed log files associated with the “Bang Box” click fraud criminal complaint case #2005-037331 -- filed by Advanced Internet Technologies, Inc. (AIT – www.ait.com) against the Fayetteville Publishing Company (www.fayobserver.com or www.fayettevillenc.com ) -- and the lawsuit where FPC sued to get its servers back and AIT countersued alleging click fraud, unfair and deceptive trade practices and breach of contract. File No: 06 CVS 67 Superior Court, Cumberland County, North Carolina.
“We received the logs from Web hosting company AIT, and it appeared to us that this traffic is repetitive and manufactured,” Boyenger said. Click Defense is a company specializing in combating click fraud and obtaining refunds for clients.
The complaint and subsequent counter-claim lawsuit alleges that the manufactured traffic's sole intent is to drive up the number of impressions thus driving up the bid price for PPC advertising through the search engines and Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) members. Additionally, the lawsuit and discovery allege that many of the clicks made across the PPC ads were done so without even loading the designated website.
“The type of click fraud alleged in this lawsuit is new and very clever,” Boyenger said. “The traffic patterns and IP addresses blend with the ISP’s address space and make it appear like legitimate traffic. Boyenger says he contacted Charles Broadwell, the Publisher for FPC, who did not comment.
According to the case filings, FPC co-located its servers in AIT’s Data Center for years and was being fed advertiser ads from search engines, syndicates, and other IAB members to its Web site. It alleges that FPC hired a third-party to rent a web server inside AIT’s Data Center in order to click on the ads without generating suspicious external traffic patterns.
The lawsuit and criminal complaints filed with the Fayetteville Police Department were escalated to the NC SBI and FBI allege that AIT was able to monitor Web traffic to and from the Fayetteville Observers Web site and that up to 80 percent of it could be potentially manufactured.
The complaint and counter-claim filing also allege that AIT, like many other local and national advertisers, spent a significant amount of advertising dollars on the Fayetteville Observer's web site, especially in the form of print advertising as many print ads were tied to the online ads for advertisers. AIT's Chief Information Officer, Michael Roberts said, "This whole lawsuit came about when we (AIT) grew suspicious that we were being over-billed for advertising."
Clarence Briggs, CEO and Founder of AIT said he has compiled a list of both national and local advertisers who conducted business with FPC. Briggs said he suggests those advertisers use third-party experts, such as Click Defense which is a well-respected company in the field of Web

Where: Halle,Germany

Where: london,

Where: Ferrara,Italy
Post your news to the World.See you news here immediately. It's easy and free!
Create free account or Login.



