Judges Körthig , Dr. Schumacher , Schleif decided 11/5/07 willingful against complainant B. Schneider ignoring her statement 11/3/07and investigation against judge Bösken
Germany (Press Release) November 9, 2007 --
After receiving judgement in case Amtsgericht (Inferior Court)Düsseldorf 30 C 13716/06 B.Schneider VS Zvonko Sesar ( advocats B/S/H Düsseldorf) , Miss B. Schneider had to complain the judgement and -again- the willingful unlawful discriminating and prejudiced attitude of judge Bösken ( compare 3133E-22/07 ; 1 AR/Abl.4 A/07 ).E.g. : judgement was not delivered legally , content of the case´s decription was not correct and true ,judge ignored facts , witness reports and evidences mentioned in the complain - compare ZPO § 313 , ZPO § 320 , § 331a , §321 Abs.4 , HR( UNO ) , GG ( Basic Law) Art. 1 i. comb. w. Art. 2 , GG Art. 3 , GG Art. 79 / 3 , GG Art.20 , GG Art.103, EMRK Art. 6 / 1 , ZPO § 568 /1 , ZPO § 320 , ZPO § 321 , GG Art. 97 , and others - . and also the fact that burglary happend also in the sense comparing it with a decison of the BGH (10/18/06.10.2006; § 287 ZPO ) . The judge is well known for not reading files properly .
The president of the Superior ( case 1402E-14 )and Inferior Court wrote in September ,there will be again investigations against the judge and regarding the complains about the judgement. Although the "Presidents" have not made any decision except sending the judgemnent (9/14/07) again to the compainant´s correct /new address some judges of the Superior Court blamed B. Schneider to have written an illegal appeal . She was forced to write a statement avoiding to have to pay fees . She wrote a fax and letter (11/3/07) explained the case and explained it is not an APPEAL , but a complain against the judgement - in the cases mentioned above- and the judge Bösken . The judges ignored her statement , the CASE ,ongoing investigations , writings of " Presidents" and send her todaythe DECISION 11/5/07 : The ILLEGAL APPEAL failed . An Appeal had to be signed and /or written by an advocat .
This information was also missing in the judgement (in general last added page) .
The judges´ behaviour and decisions violating willingful THE DEMOCRACY and HUMAN RIGHTS .Fighting for damages is not a privilege it is a legal matter to receive "some" compensation. The burglary happend ( investigation police, solicitors) ) and the ( meanwhile) Ex- hotel manger is guilty of having had lacks of security and safety .
###
The president of the Superior ( case 1402E-14 )and Inferior Court wrote in September ,there will be again investigations against the judge and regarding the complains about the judgement. Although the "Presidents" have not made any decision except sending the judgemnent (9/14/07) again to the compainant´s correct /new address some judges of the Superior Court blamed B. Schneider to have written an illegal appeal . She was forced to write a statement avoiding to have to pay fees . She wrote a fax and letter (11/3/07) explained the case and explained it is not an APPEAL , but a complain against the judgement - in the cases mentioned above- and the judge Bösken . The judges ignored her statement , the CASE ,ongoing investigations , writings of " Presidents" and send her todaythe DECISION 11/5/07 : The ILLEGAL APPEAL failed . An Appeal had to be signed and /or written by an advocat .
This information was also missing in the judgement (in general last added page) .
The judges´ behaviour and decisions violating willingful THE DEMOCRACY and HUMAN RIGHTS .Fighting for damages is not a privilege it is a legal matter to receive "some" compensation. The burglary happend ( investigation police, solicitors) ) and the ( meanwhile) Ex- hotel manger is guilty of having had lacks of security and safety .
###
Email
Print
SPAM
