United States of America (Press Release) April 11, 2008 --
Hello,
I am the owner of a Local Music Venue in Atlanta and I was browsing the net and came up on several "STiiLPOiNT BREAKS UP" Articles. I have read 3 different story's about the break Up of STiiLPOiNT and feel obligated to enlighten everyone on the Correct version
It is a well established fact that the owner of the label had some alcohol/drug issues and royally destroyed the bands reputation by threatening most every club owner the band came in contact with (including Myself) and in the process used intimidation to control the obviously frightened 19 year singer of the band, this is documented in many places such as Music Incider magazine, free press release, ect..ect..
It is also a well established fact that the band was not getting along due to many reasons all having to do with The owner of SMR putting the strain of booking shows, promotion, and anything else you could think of on the Bands shoulders so he could sit back and do nothing. This is also well documented.
finally I would imagine just like anyone the band got tired of being bullied around and left SMR in the dust, just like the first band that signed with SMR, and also The band that Signed after STiiLPOiNT. So lets see here the label has only signed three bands (Face Reck doesn't count because that is the owner of the labels band) and each one of them has all left. I think it is obvious which one of these story's are true..
From what I've read You have one man who is mad at life because he blew his one chance and now is trying to live his dream off of other bands by any means necessary even if that means threatening and putting other peoples lives in danger. This man is dangerous and should be arrested on many charges.
I'm sure The owner will post something on the net to TRY to cover his tracks but lets be honest The Evidence doesn't lie Mister and all the evidence points at you!
Sincerely, Anonymous Club Owner
I am the owner of a Local Music Venue in Atlanta and I was browsing the net and came up on several "STiiLPOiNT BREAKS UP" Articles. I have read 3 different story's about the break Up of STiiLPOiNT and feel obligated to enlighten everyone on the Correct version
It is a well established fact that the owner of the label had some alcohol/drug issues and royally destroyed the bands reputation by threatening most every club owner the band came in contact with (including Myself) and in the process used intimidation to control the obviously frightened 19 year singer of the band, this is documented in many places such as Music Incider magazine, free press release, ect..ect..
It is also a well established fact that the band was not getting along due to many reasons all having to do with The owner of SMR putting the strain of booking shows, promotion, and anything else you could think of on the Bands shoulders so he could sit back and do nothing. This is also well documented.
finally I would imagine just like anyone the band got tired of being bullied around and left SMR in the dust, just like the first band that signed with SMR, and also The band that Signed after STiiLPOiNT. So lets see here the label has only signed three bands (Face Reck doesn't count because that is the owner of the labels band) and each one of them has all left. I think it is obvious which one of these story's are true..
From what I've read You have one man who is mad at life because he blew his one chance and now is trying to live his dream off of other bands by any means necessary even if that means threatening and putting other peoples lives in danger. This man is dangerous and should be arrested on many charges.
I'm sure The owner will post something on the net to TRY to cover his tracks but lets be honest The Evidence doesn't lie Mister and all the evidence points at you!
Sincerely, Anonymous Club Owner

Atlanta Club Owner reveals truth about STiiLPOiNT's Break-up
Email
Print
SPAM






