Illegal fees are demanded by the Amtsgericht + Landgericht in Düsseldorf .Illegal bills are send to the complainant
Germany (Press Release) June 18, 2008 --
In the case 30 C 13716/06 AG Düsseldorf and the case 22S 457/07 ( 1402E-14 ; 1402E -449) LG Düsseldorf : B. Schneider VS Zvonko Sesar ( heavily burglary in hotel/ appartment in Düsseldorf) the judges and the court pay- office are demanding illegal fees and sending again and again illegal bills to the complainant B. Schneider .
B. Schneider had to pay as the victim and complainant all fees before the trial was send to court . On Monday she received a second time a writing from the pay - office demanding some further fees which would not have been payed . Although , she wrote a statement and send explanaitions about the records of payment to the court , to the prosecutor- who was also informed in the case of betray - and to the pay - office . The facts were ignored and another bill was send to the old address to the attention of the complainant .
The complainant B. Schneider moved to another city and informed in time the court . The court is also ignoring this fact and again and again documents are send to the old address.
I September 2007 the decison of the process was also send to a wrong address . Furthermore , the judgement was not acceptable regarding correctness , truth and summary of facts . The judge ignored willingful - like during the whole trial - all witness reports and evidences submitted by the complainant .
Therefore , B. Schneider had to inform and send complains against the judge a g a i n to the president of the court .
The complains were ignored .
Finally - suddenly- , although the president of the Landgericht send the message that the president of the Amtsgericht is responsibleto make a decision , some judges of the Landgericht decided the complain - writing would be a ILLEGAL BERUFUNG ( appeal) instead a ABLEHUNUNGSANTRAG ( rejection of the judge) . The statement of the complainant against this unlawful
reproach was again ignored and misunderpretated . She was forced to pay the unlawful demand to avoid executions . She payed the bill , but at the same time she send again complains to the court explaining that the payments are only precaution - payments and she is demanding repayments and reparations as well as in the case at the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf .
It has to be mentioned that the advocat of the defendant also demanded some fees for the so called unlawful appeal , which was not written and Not send by the complainant to the Landgericht . This was abolutely NOT acceptable . ThereforeB. Schneider had again send complains to the court .There wwas no appeal written or send and there was no trial or writen orrespondance between the parties . Finbally , the advocat/ defendant revoke the ilegal demand .
The VICTIM , the COMPLAINANT B. Schneider is still fighting for justice and waiting for legal serious statements by the court and repayments and repartions .
The behaviour of the judges and the pay - office are similar to organised crimes and therefore fair investigations have to be made to achieve justice and to safe the democracy .
###
B. Schneider had to pay as the victim and complainant all fees before the trial was send to court . On Monday she received a second time a writing from the pay - office demanding some further fees which would not have been payed . Although , she wrote a statement and send explanaitions about the records of payment to the court , to the prosecutor- who was also informed in the case of betray - and to the pay - office . The facts were ignored and another bill was send to the old address to the attention of the complainant .
The complainant B. Schneider moved to another city and informed in time the court . The court is also ignoring this fact and again and again documents are send to the old address.
I September 2007 the decison of the process was also send to a wrong address . Furthermore , the judgement was not acceptable regarding correctness , truth and summary of facts . The judge ignored willingful - like during the whole trial - all witness reports and evidences submitted by the complainant .
Therefore , B. Schneider had to inform and send complains against the judge a g a i n to the president of the court .
The complains were ignored .
Finally - suddenly- , although the president of the Landgericht send the message that the president of the Amtsgericht is responsibleto make a decision , some judges of the Landgericht decided the complain - writing would be a ILLEGAL BERUFUNG ( appeal) instead a ABLEHUNUNGSANTRAG ( rejection of the judge) . The statement of the complainant against this unlawful
reproach was again ignored and misunderpretated . She was forced to pay the unlawful demand to avoid executions . She payed the bill , but at the same time she send again complains to the court explaining that the payments are only precaution - payments and she is demanding repayments and reparations as well as in the case at the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf .
It has to be mentioned that the advocat of the defendant also demanded some fees for the so called unlawful appeal , which was not written and Not send by the complainant to the Landgericht . This was abolutely NOT acceptable . ThereforeB. Schneider had again send complains to the court .There wwas no appeal written or send and there was no trial or writen orrespondance between the parties . Finbally , the advocat/ defendant revoke the ilegal demand .
The VICTIM , the COMPLAINANT B. Schneider is still fighting for justice and waiting for legal serious statements by the court and repayments and repartions .
The behaviour of the judges and the pay - office are similar to organised crimes and therefore fair investigations have to be made to achieve justice and to safe the democracy .
###
Email
Print
SPAM
