FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(Free-Press-Release.com) March 2, 2009 -- The grounds for the proposed Action against the Canadian Minister of National Revenue include fraud, discrimination, harassment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, abuse of process, breach of trust, breach of privacy, negligence, breech of confidential relationship, invasion of privacy, arbitrary targeting of taxpayers and abuse of power.

Canadian Citizens allege that the Minister of National Revenue is routinely targeting individuals and businesses, violating the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Canadian Human Rights Act, the Canadian Bill of Rights, the Statute of Limitations, Contract Law and the Income Tax Act including the Taxpayers Bill of Rights.

The Minister of National Revenue and CRA allegedly bully, harass, intimidate, and illegally

demand financial information from Canadian taxpayers.The CRA issues illegal garnishment orders based on Statutes without proper Court Orders or registered letters.

This ruthless intimidation is to pressure the taxpayer to enter into a contract with the Minister of National Revenue to pay the alleged amount demanded.

Demanding taxpayers financial information ignores Sections 7 and 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and cancels the rights to privacy, silence and protection against self-incrimination. On February 11, 2009, Louise Dickson of the Victoria Times Colonist reported the Charter of Rights Victory in Court against the CRA by Hal Neumann and his wife Maureen Rivers.

"Jury awards B.C. man $1.3M for taxman's raid",

where the Supreme Court Jury of B.C. ruled that the CRA invasion and search of a citizens home violated the privacy protection in Section 7 and the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure in Section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Victoria lawyer Steven Kelliher asked the jury to give a message to the CRA - "The CRA don't rule us-. They have an obligation to respect our fundamental rights. They serve us. They don't prey on us." The verdict of the jury is described by the statement:"Gestapo tactics of the Revenue Agency Brought to Light" in the precedent setting case.

Kim Bolan reported in the Vancouver Sun on July 21, 2008,that - B.C. Hells Angels, associates, wives and girlfriends- got the CRA to withdraw demands for detailed financial information about their earnings and assets, including any - hidden - outside the country because it violated the Income Tax Act and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Vancouver lawyer David Martin, Brian Airth as well as others linked to Hells Angels wanted a declaration that the CRA was guilty of illegal conduct by targeting the plaintiffs through an initiative known as - Project MOGAL, - or the - Hells Angel Project - HA -. The CRA gave private financial information to third parties, including police.

The CRA withdrew the letters of requirement in a precedent setting - out-of-court - agreement made on the same date as the Federal Court challenge was to be heard last spring.